Accounting Firms, Five Points

SAS No. 146 Explained: What CPA Firms Need to Know

Published on07 November 2024

The AICPA’s Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 146 brings a significant shift in quality management practices for individual audit engagements. Like SQMS No. 1, which establishes quality management at the firm level, SAS 146 applies these standards directly to each engagement, strengthening the integrity and reliability of audits. With an effective date for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2025, it’s essential for CPA firms to understand how this standard will shape audit quality. Here are five key points about SAS 146, highlighting its critical role and the steps firms should consider.

1. Aligns with SQMS No. 1 to Extend Quality Management to Individual Engagements

SAS 146 takes the foundational principles of SQMS No. 1, applying them at the engagement level to ensure quality management in every audit. While SQMS No. 1 sets firm-wide policies, SAS 146 brings these expectations to life within each individual engagement, ensuring consistent quality across the board. By integrating these standards, firms can uphold a high level of quality management across all engagements, from smaller clients to large, complex audits.

2. Holds Engagement Partners Fully Accountable for Driving Quality

In SAS 146, the engagement partner plays a central role in managing quality throughout the audit process. The standard places full accountability on the engagement partner to oversee each audit’s quality management, ensuring that all aspects of the engagement align with the firm’s policies and meet professional standards. This responsibility includes setting the tone for the team, directing key audit tasks, supervising work, and reviewing all significant judgments. For firms, this means reinforcing the engagement partner’s role as a champion of quality and accountability at every stage.

3. Stresses the Importance of Unwavering Ethics and Independence

SAS 146 emphasizes the need for strict adherence to ethical standards, particularly around independence, as a core foundation of audit quality. The engagement partner is responsible for ensuring that all team members understand and adhere to these ethical requirements. Should any threats to independence arise, they must be identified, evaluated, and addressed promptly. This focus on ethics reinforces public trust in the audit process and strengthens the integrity of audit findings.

4. Sets Rigorous Standards for Documentation and Review

SAS 146 also heightens documentation requirements, especially in more complex audits. Thorough documentation of audit decisions, significant judgments, and the rationale behind them is mandated to support transparency and accountability. This standard doesn’t just help meet regulatory requirements; it also provides a strong audit trail, aiding in future reviews and supporting the defensibility of the audit work performed. By setting clear expectations for documenting engagement procedures, SAS 146 enhances transparency and prepares firms for comprehensive quality reviews.

5. Promotes Professional Skepticism and Guards Against Unconscious Bias

A key component of SAS 146 is the emphasis on professional skepticism and the need to counteract unconscious biases that may affect audit judgments. The engagement partner is encouraged to cultivate a culture of skepticism within the team, especially when making critical decisions or facing complex issues. This standard requires audit teams to remain vigilant, critically assessing evidence and challenging assumptions where necessary. By instilling these practices, SAS 146 aims to strengthen audit reliability and reduce the risk of oversight, particularly in high-stakes areas.

Conclusion

SAS 146 represents an important advancement in quality management for audit engagements. As the effective date approaches, CPA firms will need to proactively adopt these practices to strengthen their quality management processes at the engagement level. By embracing SAS 146, firms can enhance accountability, deepen their commitment to ethical standards, and foster a culture of skepticism that supports high-quality audits. This standard not only reinforces the profession’s dedication to quality but also builds public trust in the reliability of financial reporting. While implementing SAS 146 may bring challenges, the benefits of a robust quality management system are invaluable for the future of the auditing profession.

Elevate Your CPA Firm with CPAClub

Discover how CPAClub can enhance your firm’s quality management and compliance efforts while driving growth and efficiency. Learn more at cpaclub.cpa/quality-management.

About CPAClub

CPAClub is transforming how public accounting firms and companies meet accounting, advisory and assurance requirements by turning the traditional model upside down. Founded and led by one of Accounting Today’s Top 100 Most Influential People in Accounting and one of CPA Practice Advisor’s 20 Under 40 Top Influencers, CPAClub was recognized as a Top New Product by Accounting Today. CPAClub offers onshore accounting, advisory and assurance solutions throughout the United States and abroad via its award-winning subscription model. Learn more at cpaclub.cpa.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Subscribe to receive the latest thought leadership posts to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Share This Post

Related Thought Leadership

Accounting Firms, Five Points
The PCAOB’s new Quality Control (QC) standard, QC 1000, is set to reshape the landscape for all PCAOB-registered firms. With an effective date of December 15, 2025, and initial evaluation and reporting requirements to follow, it’s critical for firms to understand what this entails. Here are five key points about QC 1000, exploring its significance...
Accounting Firms, Companies
The accounting industry might be a robust one. But if current trends don’t shift within the next few years, CPAs might become much harder to find. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) determined that by 2019, about 75% of all CPAs reached retirement age. That should be concerning for anyone who has ever relied...
Accounting Firms, Companies
Billable hours have long been the primary metric for measuring efficiency and productivity in many organizations. Why? The more hours an employee bills, the more revenue they generate on behalf of the organization. The trouble is billable hours do not always give us the full story. So what is the best way to bill your...